Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 2 · column 1 of 3 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

RAPPAHANNOCK NfcW§

/ PUBLISHED fMUHlSDAt MORNING kl

At WwMnftou, Refpaluuraoct Ceuaty, Virginia

TELEPHONE: WASHINGTON 8^SI

) | ^

r f'.:

BASIL C. BURKE, JR. Own«r

Mrs. SARAS C. LATHAM, Mloafing Editor

f.';.

at Mm PMt Offiea at

SUBSCRIPTION (in adraaeo) ..

.. $1H PER TSAR

THE COMPARISON

Newspaper writers love cliches.* An apt phrase, once established, will appear repeatedly i» editorals and news columns.

Inevitably, the two millionaire contestants in New York’s gubernatorial race were dubbed th® “golden boys,” and form that time on, no reporter feels he is doing justice to a story of Harriman vs Rockefeller unless he sticks in the term “golden boys.” From a newspaper reporter,a standpoint, the race is a “natural.” Never before have two men run for high office that were so similar in a most unusual way. Both are multimillionaires. Neither worked to amass his fortune, each " having inherited the same. Both claim to be for the working man, and are, of course, avowed “liberals”, despite their immense wealth. M A ,. The thought occurs to us .however; that one startling similarity has been overlooked in drawing comparisons between the “golden boys.” Governor Harriman, as a candidate representing a great national party, the Democrats. ancLNelson Rockefeller, as a candidate representing another great national party, the Republicans, have exactly the same platform. There is no difference. The voters are |4IC dAIUC piOWUl uit * v not being offered a choice of political ^* economic plulosophies. We only hope the race between the “golde r_ _ .... _•_ liU*«.«l im puie». *re umj uupc .»v»i «— ---- in New York isn’t a preview of another liberal me-too race in new iors isu t a •*“''*“'** -- in the 1960 presidential race, because it's getting so now you can’t tell a candidate’s party without a scorecard.

B.C.B.Jr. f

51.4%