is daily violating the Patent Laws, and unjustly i depriving Ueorge Wattol his property,bi I'tnkint hii Patent Plow, without his authontj or coi ■ ••• t. 'A c desire t.> correct the imprsasUm thus sought t< be made, and inform sou anil the public that tfc concern of GEORGE WATT i CO. is etill in ex istence; that Geo. Watt, the inventor aad paten tee, has not sold the rwht, or authorised any one