Double Check This column has again un doubtedly been misunderstood. It never dawned on me that there were two cases in Oregon. My mind wa- on the Brewster case . so I appologize and always will stand apologetically correct ed. What was taken as a ‘Chide is nint :a;cd. but I t lank the sender of the editorial. "Our Lost Reputation", what set me right. Also, the writer of the letter tunsignedt "what charges Thou". I beg your pardon. And one even thought I was hitting- the “mighty Co-op. . Nope, just the teamster By Boss that was. I ain’t in no scandal mood at this time. I deeply appreciate the infor tfon At least I am no worse off than the Present Administra tion. The I like Ike" has become the one big; denial. Will the President resign? Worst. Rot I ever Heard.” Now. if he is taking the broad sense of the word ROT. as Webster defines it as pertaining to.sheep, boy. he's got something. It’s a slam in the puss lor his followers . . . but ' . ..(I to coni''. Never will this D. C. change the question on this wind up and throw or assume | the role of "I told you so”. Back .seat occupants are never ■ unity of speeding . . . it's the guy at the wheel. That was denial number one on this Presidential calendar. The people of America are in for some extreme eye open ing m the very near future . read your editorials. You have
58.5%Tuesday, April 9, 1957 — The Farmville herald and farmer-leader · Page 4
Block 95
You’re reading Tuesday, April 9, 1957 — The Farmville herald and farmer-leader.
Citation & transcription details
Cite this article
“Double Check.” Farmville Herald, April 1957.
“Double Check.” Farmville Herald, Apr 1957.
About this text
OCR from one source block. Related blocks and story continuations may be separate records.
Page 4 · column 6 of 9.
Machine transcription · vendor-alto
OCR source: vendor-alto
58.47% mean segment confidence