Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 1 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
fil •v: ,To Report Against
Family 'Farm Review
About 35 farmers gave their ▼ote of4 approval to the recommendations of the county commit-* tee regarding the Family Farm Review in the open county-wide meeting Friday night, September 21, at the Courthouse. I Step by step, number by number, they voted , in agreement with the report ae published for two weeks in the county papfer. r The step by step vote ran in this manner: V' 1. Agriculture Research Adnw— upon motion made by D. D. Miller,' seconded by W. C. Campbell, unanimous approval that present program is adequate and no in-« crease recommended.
2.. Bureau AgricuL Economics
by motion of W. C. Campbell, adopted recommendations to continue present scale. ' i 8. Co-operative Extension—^upon motion of L. R. Hudson, 27; votes to recommend no expansion, S votes opposed.^ 1^'
4, Office of Information—upon motion of W. C. Campbell, alt but I voted to agree with abolish* ment.
39.2%