Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 4 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
eat, a avil action or otner prqper proceeding for redress or preventive relief, including,, an application for a permanent or temporary injunction restraining order, or other order. In anv proceeding hereunder the United States shall be liable for costs the same as a private person.” In this excerpt, note the phrase, “or is about to engage”. Does this civil rights bill really provide that a person may be sent to pail, without jury trial, on the basis of an allegation that he practiced or was about to practice discrimination, as indicted in the third part of my question? With respect to an injunction, which is an order of a court, the United States Code provides:
“A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority . . disobedience or resistance to its writ.proCesa, orler, rule, decree or command.’ *
When, in another section, the Code provides for judy trials in certain contempt cases, it includes this language:
"This section shall not applv to —contempts committed in disobedience of any lawful writ, process. order, rule, decree or command entered in any suit or action brought or prosecuted in the name of, or on behalf of, the Uniter States.”
And. as we have read, the civil rights bill states that the Attorney General will bring these injunction proceedings in the name of the United States.
Available space dose not permit an analysis of other drastic provisions of this civil rights bill. But let us mart this well: no words of mine will make the legislation more drastic than it is. and no amount of describing it as “mild” or “moderate” will make
55.4%