Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
What Other Editors
Say on Indo-China ;.
Francis G. Dominick, Hasbrouck Heights,(N.J.) Observer: “We have failed and apparently still fail to give adequate impqr» tance to ‘loss of face’ in Korea and in China. Indi|t may be next. In short, it appears as if our diplomacy in Asia is fundamentally equivalent to our diplomacy in Europe. >. It ¥as not worked and inmy opinion, will not. My own experience during the last war in, China and India gave the basis for this view."
Wm. J. McCabe, Haverstraw(N.Y.) Rockland County Times: “The Eisenhower administration ' is confronted with an unpalatable dish. To the World they must fob low the Truman policy of intervention. At Home they must live up to the campaign promise‘tb g$t - out of the fighting in Asia (Kdrek—Indo - China—what’s the difference?) Eventually the U. S. will have to employ the army of Chaing Kai-Shek on the mainland in regular or guerilla operations or get out of Asia.” -
Howard Rausch, Metuchen (N.J.) Recorder: “I don’t think we should commit American boys to defend a French puppet regime, even at the risk of having that regime supplanted by another puppet regime. Any victory we might win in this field, doubtful thqugh such a victory might be, would be ’ nullified by the tremendous propaganda weapons such U* S. action would deliver to the communists.” ‘George Cleary, Gloucester City. (N.J.) News: “The old adage rto give them enough rope and they“r will hang themselves’ is wishful thinking. No real peace can ever, be attained in the world until
71.5%