Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 7 · column 1 of 3 · from the scan, no model involved
SPECIAL COMMISSIONER’S SALE
OF
VALUABLE REAL ESTATE
AT
THE FRONT DOOR OF THE COURT HOUSE
WASHINGTON, RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY,
VIRGINIA, Acting under and by virtue of the authority vested in me by the degree of the Circuit Court of Rappahannock County, Virginia, entered on the 15th day of January, 1960, in the'pending chancery cause of Frances Trott Baggerly v. Frankflin Clyde Baggerly, Incompetent; I will offer for sale at public auction at the front door of the Court House in Washington, Rappahannock County, on
FRIDAY, TTEBRUAJfY 19, 19M),
AT 10 K)0 O’CLOCK M, (ECTi.
1. AH thftt certain tract of land known as the PresSj^l terian Church Lot, referred to as Lot #22 on the land assessment records of Rappahannock County, being the same land acquired by Franklin Clyde Baggerly from Charles W. Warden, et al., Trustees, by deed dated February 5, 1939, recorded in Deed Book 44, page 177, Save and Except a portion of said lot containing 296-Vi square feet conveyed by Franklin Clyde Baggerly to Clarence O. Oden and Sarah C. Oden, by deed dated May 15, 1952, and recorded in Deed Book 58, page 299.
2. All that certain tract of land located approximately Vi Mile Northeast of the Town of Washington, fronting on U. S. Route 211, known as the “Old Mill” property or '‘the “Baggerly Mill Property”, containing 7.852 acres as surveyed by S. M. Boyd, Jr., made on May 28, 1959, and filed as Exhibit E. in the aforementioned chancery cause.
3. All that certain tract of land containing 7.196 acres, lying on the South side of said “Old Mill” property hereinbefore described in Paragraph 2, also fronting on said U. S. Route 211, and described by survey of S. M. Boyd, Jr., Surveyor, made on May 28, 1959, and filed in the aforementioned chancery cause of Baggerly v. Baggerly.
The 7.852’Acre tract described hereinabove in Paragraph 2. and the 7.196 Acre £ract described in Paragaph 3., will be sold separately and then the two tracts will be offered as a whole, and the manner in which the two separate tracts bring a greater sum is the method wherein the prop- • erty will be solid.
80.9%