Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 8 · column 3 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

FRONT ROYAL LIVESTOCK .

October 27, 1*66 j HOGS: top weight 180-220 121.80 to 222; heavy butchers 225-275, $20 to $21.50; light butchers 135-175, 120.50 to $21.50; butcher sows 200-600 (16.75 to $18.50 , VEAL: ch. A pr. $39.50; ch. A pr. ( Heavy $30 to $35; ch. & pr. light $29 to $34. good $31 to $36.50; standard ' F?5 to $29; utility, down to $18 t LAMBS: Prime $23.60; ch. $21.85 SLAUGHTER CATTLE: Heifers: food $2C.50 to $21,^0; standard $13.50 o $19.50; utility, down to $16 Cows: comngercial $17 to $18; utilty $15.50 to $16.50; canner A cutter 111 to $15.50 / || f Bulls: commercial A good $20 to 121.80; cutter A utility, down to 118.50 STOCK-FEEDER CATTLE: Steer 1 -alves: 275-550 lbs.: good $28 to S (29.50, medium $26 to $27; inferior I t common $19 to $23.50 , Yearling steert: 575-850 lbs.: good 1 Heifer calves: 275-550 lbs.: good 1 121 to $23; med. $19 to $20.50; inf. t t com., down to' $15 (24 to $25.50; medium $21 to $23; * nferior A common, down to $16 <

MADISON MARKET 1 Steers and i

Feeder Calves ... 19.50- 31.50 1 Cows . 12.50- 18.50 ' Heifers . 18.50- 25.00 ; Bulls . 19.50- 22.75 1 Veal Calves . 21.50- 41.00 j Hogs . 20.50- 22.00 , sows . 17.00- 19.00 , 3aby calves, PH .. 5.50- 26.50 < >igs, shoats, BH 7.50- 24.00 1

Sale Every Saturday 1

i

Hunters Spend $4 Billion i On Their Favorite Sport

i An estimated 33 million hunt ! 2rs and sport fishermen in the 1 J. S. spent approximately $4 aillion in pursuit of their respective sports during 1965, I according to information ga- n :hered by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service during their slational Survey of Fishing and

dunting. License fees ac- £ :ounted for only 3,5% of this f :otal. Sport fishermen spent an , average of $5,60 per day, most of it for auxiliary equipment, j Dait and guides, food and lodg- ( ing and transportation. Only ] 11% went for fishing tackle and , 2.3% was spent on licenses. , Fishermen averaged 18.4 recreation days and travelled 801: . 5 miles during the year. Hunters in 1965 spent $6.03 per day on the average in pursuit of their sport. Big game tiunters averaged $9.55 per day while small game hunters anly spent $4.79. Over 1/3 of the hunter’s expenditures went for hunting equipment and 6.4% was spent for licenses. Trans* portation costs equalled roughly 15% of both hunting and fishing expenses. Hunting was about 3 times as popular among rual residents as among those who lived in metropolitan areas. Fishing was much more uniformly enjoyed by the population with** the highest percentage of fish- i grmen coming from smaller ' non-farm communities. In addition to direct participation in hunting, an estimated 8,196WANTED:

Representative in

field of education. Full or part time. Training and equipment furnished. Write The Manager, 1602 Rickey Drive, Charlottesville, for appointment or phone 293-3924. ll-3-4k

74.2%