Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 1 · column 7 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
vith only one dissenting vote ease )y Supervisor Foster. Highway Resident Engineer lames K. Skeens presented an >pinion and fiscal summary for 1969-70 of the secondary road ystem here. He pointed out that hree times had not been :ompleted and were carried orward to the next budget, rhese were the strengthening of wo bridges, one on Route 729 ind the other on Route 622, n c a ri v v t r n n t u The summary showed that
597,400 had been budgeted for
ill maintenance on secondary oads and that expenditures had .otaled $89,617. Replacement :osts budgeted at $23,000 had otaled $41,000 for actual ixpenditures. Incidental mprovements which had been
dlotted $68,835 in the budget lad amounted to $76,635. Total ■xpenditures were $345,441 hough total budgeted was
>324,140. The deficit is made up rom carryover funds. The contract project on Route 542 from Amissville to Viewtown had cost $81,000 for the road and $38,000 for culverts, Mr. Skeens reported. C I r F v c a c r ( I I < i ( < < The Dump Committee did not make a solid recommendation to the Board as had been requested, so the refuse question remains unsolved. The contract with the refuse company which had been serving the county had expired in August, so it was operating on a
76.6%