Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 1 · column 4 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
August 1977. When Goode filed suit seeking a reversal of the denial under the sub* division ordinance. Commonwealth Attorney Davis advised a joint executive session of the Supervisors and Planners against defending the county's action. At the same time, Davis maintained and continues to maintain that Goode has not exhausted legislative remedies open to him. Although the Supervisors accepted Davis’ position that the rezoning denial could not be supported legally under Rappahannock's subdivision ordinance, the case has been repeatedly continued and is still before the court).
No Subdivision Hearing
On Thursday, Davis elaborated on his position that Goode has not followed proper procedure and has failed to exhaust his legislative remedies. According to Davis, the developer submitted a preliminary plat to the Planning Commission but never to the Supervisors. While public hearings were held by both bodies, the hearings were under the
(Continued on Page 2)
90.1%