Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 2 of 3 · from the scan, no model involved
cisions of May 31, 1955 does recognize tnat tneproDiem is a State problem, that local differences exist, that school authorities and not the Courts “have the primary responsibility for elucidating, assessing, and solving these problems”. We are required to exercise good faith and to make a prompt and reasonable start toward compliance. But if we make a start, we shall be granted additional time. It is important to remember that no time limit has been set. We have indefinite time. .
Senator Harry F. Byrd in his statement said “The Supreme Court itself recognized the terrific impact of its decision when they themselve^\postponed the effective date, and even now have not set a date for integration, except to say that ; integration should ^proceed with 'deliberate speed’. I feel that the emphasis should be on ‘deliberate rather than on ‘speed’.” !j Tuition Grant Plan Costly To Taxpayer.
The Tuition Grant Plan will cast a prohibitive burden On the taxpayers. No proponent has felt able to estimate •its cost Whether it will require funds in an amount equivalent to an income tax rise of 20% or 50%, it is certain that two school systems will cost more than one.
72.9%