Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
COMM.E.IN 1 and
QUESTIONS
If it is a good defense to claim, “that I was not hunting only passing through to get to my car”, then what protection does a landowner have under the law, and why go to the trouble and expense of placing posters on your property? It would appear to me that this decision of the court would open the door to every hunter who desired to hunt on posted property by the mere pretext that he was not hunting only passing through to get to his car. '
There' are hundreds of persons who can assure you that die decision of the Supreme Court was pi error when it handed down the decision" that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional and there are even those who can tell you what God intended concerning it. I am more than willing to plead ignorant of what God’s intention was about anything and everything and accept the ruling of the Supreme Court without reservation, but I cannot agree for an instant that a man on posted property, with a gun, a hunting license, in hunting territory, at 10:45 a. m. the first day of hunting season was not hunting.
The fact that he had not fired * a gun, to me would have no bearing on the charge. Every deer, hunter knows, only too well, that he may go for days, weeks, yes, and even seasons without ever fifing a gun, AND the reason it obvious: he had not an opportunity to sight in on a deer.
HENRY C. GORE.
57.3%