Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 4 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
Petaluma's should be sent to the Attorney General for an opinion on constitutionality under Virginia law.
“You’d be asking for a negative response,” Miller answered.
“I think it’s dangerous,” Plavnick agreed, adding that “you’re a winner until you’ve been declared a loser.” ‘‘You’re exactly right,” esonded Miller. “Rapjahannock’s been a winner ;ince 1968 and now we're jetting ready to get clobjered.”
Luke asked Plavnick if his planning firm would work with the planning District 9 staff as a consultant on Rappahannock’s comprehensive plan.
Planning Coats
Plavnick said his company was more than willing to work jointly with the District personnel and noted that having the Planning District staff do the "leg work" could save the county a lot of money. He reported that his organization could work either on a "lump sum” contract or on a per diem basis.
"We want a lump sum contract,” Miller responded after checking quickly around the table to see heads nodding in agreement.
"A small lump," added Stokes.
According to Plavnick, the comprehensive plan and ordinance review undertaken by his Firm for Orange County cost $30,000 in local revenue and $3,000 from PD9 in services. He declined to give an estimate on what a similar project would run in Rappahannock, adding that he first needed to know what information the county already had available and how much of the work would be done by the PD9 staff.
Returning to the content of a comprehensive plan. Plavnick maintained that it would be dangerous to try to control density “on the basis of utilities." If the county
76.1%