Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 3 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
Mr. CHIPERFIELD. I am wondering whether or not section 102 of the bill does not take care
«-hat sit'»)3tir>n,...
Mr. HARRISON of Virginia. I do not think so.
Mr. CHIPERFIELD. The gentleman from Virginia knows I supported in committee an amendment somewhat similar to the one he has now offered.
The record on this points out that section 102 makes clear that United States military personnel can be assigned to foreign nations only for noncombat duty, including furnishing of training and advice. The language was i ncluded to give reassurance that the military assistance authorized in this bill does not include participation by the United States forces in eombat. I am wondering IE that languarge would not take care of the amendment that the gentleman from Virginia suggests.
Mr. HARRISON of Virginia. That language authorizes the use of troops under certain circumstances. This amendment forbids the use of troops. I think there is a great difference.
The CHAIRMAN. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Harrison) to the Vorys amendment. ‘
79.7%