Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 6 · column 3 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
Commissioner’s Notice
VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY. Mildred Wood Maney, Complainant
vs. Rachel Wood 'Piehler, Alcinda Marie Piehler, an infant, John Andrews Piehler, Mildred Wood Maney, Robert Earl Maney, Rachel Jeannette Maney, an infant, Mild-ed Earl Maney, an infant, Jacquelin Maney, an infant, the unborn children of Rachel Wood Piehler; the unborn children of Mildred Wood Maney; the unborn issue of Rachel Wood Piehler; theunborn issue of Mildred Wood Maney; the unknown heirs of Rachel \yood Piehler; the unknown heirs of Mildred Wood Maney; the unknown heirs of Alcinda Marie Piehler; the unknown heirs of Rachel Jeanette Maney; the unknown heirs of Mildred Earl Maney; the unknown heirs of Jacquelin Maney; the unknown heirs of the unborn children of 'Rachel Wood piehler; the unknown heirs of the unborn children of Mildred Wood Maney; persons unknown or persons yet to be born or created and parties unknown
Defendants
EXTRACT from a decree of the Circuit Court of said County entered in the above entitled cause on the 20th day of September, 1950: ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, the court doth adjudge, order and dec •'»e that this cause be and it hereby is, referred to James M. Settle, a Commissioner in Chancery of this Court, to take, state and forthwith report an account showing the following:
(1) Whether all necessary parties are properly before the Court in this cause.
(2) What real estate was devised to the parties to this suit by W. G. Wood, deceased, and the fee simple and annual value thereof.
(3) What are the respective interests of the said parties in the said real estate and whether or not any persons other than the parties to this suit own any interest in the said real estate.
(4) The taxes due on the said real estate, the liens against the said real estate and their priorities.
(5) Whether or not the interest of the complainant would be promoted by a sale of the five acres, described in the bill of complaint, to George W. Wood for $500.00 cash, and whether or not the rights of any other person would be violated thereby.
(6) Whether or not the interests of the infant remainderman would be promoted by a sale of
74.8%