Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 17 · column 1 of 5 · from the scan, no model involved
From rage z
Well, gee, all I can say here is that I thought it was noteworthy too. That’s why I noted it, Mr. Baumgardner—to show that Senator Aldhizer’s integrity was such that despite the fact that his law firm represents Vepco, he voted the right way on House Bill 664, that is, against it. Somehow, Mr. Baumgardner seeks to chastise ► me for pointing out, in all fairness, that the good Senator, whom 1 am supporting for re-election, placed principle above the pressures or potential pressures of a lobbyistclient.
But my main point, which Mr. Baumgardner seems to have missed, is quite simple. No lawmaker should be torn between two masters, or burdened by trying to honestly represent the general interests of the people and the very special vested interests of a particular corporate client. That fact that very often such a lawyerlegislator votes without regard to his legal clients does not in any way make the situation a sound one. That’s why so many states and so many Federal agencies have strict contiict-ot-interest laws and regulations.
A public servant cannot easily or well serve two masters at one time. A public servant should not be torn between his duty to the
94.1%