Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 3 · column 3 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
654 B St., S.E, Washington, D.C. RACHEL JEANETTE MANEY, ___■ an infant, "664 B St., S.E. Washington, D.C. MILDRED EARL MANEY, an infant 654 B St., S.E. Washington, D.C. JACQUELINE MANEY, * an infant, -J 654 B St., S.E. Washington, D.C. RACHEL WOOD PIEHLER, 165 Glenbrook Road, Rochester, ■ New York. -v. v Y: ,Y ALCINDA MARIE PIEHLER,
an infant, '165 Glenbrook Road, Rochester ' New York. ~ . \ ~ JOHN ANDREW PIEHLER, 165 Glenbrook Road*, “Rochester,
New York. ; v
The unborn children of Rachel , Wood Piohler; the Unborn children of Mildred Wood Maney; The unborn issue of Rachel Wood Piehler; The unborn issue of Mildred Wood Maney; The unknown heirs of Mildred Wood Maney; The unborn heirs of Rachel Wood Piehler; The unknown heirs of Aleinda Marie Piehler; The unknown heirs of Rachel Jeanette Maney; The unknown hears of Mildred Earl Maney; The unknown heirs of Jacquelin Maney; The unknown ‘heirs of the unborn children of Rachel Wood Piehler; The unknown heirs of the unborn children of Mildred Wood Maney; Persons unknown or persons yet t to be born or created and parties r> unknown. Defendants.
EXTRACT from a decree of the Circuit Court of said County entered in the above entitled cause on the 24th day of January, 1951: _ Y.
“On consideration whereof, the „ Court doth Adjudge, Order and Decree that this cause he, and it hereby is, referred to James M. Settle, a Commissioner in Chanc-, ery of this Court, to take, state and forthwith report an account showing the following:
(1) Whether all necessary parties are properly Before the Court ' in this cause. YY ’ (2) What real estate was devised to. the parties to this suit by W. G. Wood, deceased, and the fee simple and annual value thereof^
tereSts of the said parties in the said real estate and whether or hot any persons other than the parties to this suit own any interest in the said real estate. r■ (4) Whether or not the interest ^ of the complainant would be promoted by a sale of the timber: on said property |ind whether or' hot the rights ef any other per- i. Son would be violated thereby, f';: 2 j (5) Whether or not the interests of the infant remaindermen would be promoted by a sale of the timber on the said property.
(6) The taxes doe on the said real estate, the liens against the said real estate and their priorif* ties. ; Y <7) Whether or not the com?! plainant has a right to have a said of said timber on said property, to have her life interest eosuatfr* ■ •’ted and paid to her in a gross sunt ! in cash, and to bans the residue ef..$t^*Hrehaseiaoaey
51.0%