Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 3 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
Describing Sperryville as , “one of the crucial commercial centers of this | county,” Crigler on Monday challenged the blanket , perscription against building there. He indicated that he ( wanted to introduce i testimony from a zoning | expert “on the part of Rosser . Payne” should Snead decide ( to rule on the con- | stitutionality of the flood , plain ordinance. I
In addition to the flood plain ordinance restrictions, i Crigler has attacked other areas of the county’s Zoning i Ordinance. "Arbitrary and capricious, unreasonable, i unconstitutional” are all used < to describe Article 1-1 that sets forth zoning districts; Article 1-2 that requires adherence to all specifications included in the Zoning Ordinance; Article 5 that sets requirements for residential-business districts, including Sperryville; Article 6 that states the requirement for rezoning to residential subdivision before approval of any subdivision of more than five lots, any one of which contains less than 25acres and Article 10-2 that calls for right-of-way not less than 50 feet wide.
More Evidence?
While Crigler didn't dispute any of the facts included in a memorandum filed by BZA attorney Robert Fitzgerald, he said he wanted to file additonal evidence for his client explaining “why certain things were or weren’t done.”
Maurice Biddle, attorney for the Stuckeys, indicated that he was not in a position to say whether he wanted to file additional evidence until the Judge had ruled on questions already submitted.
Commonwealth Attorney George Davis repeated the Supervisors assertion that the BZA had acted contrary to section 9.7 of the Zoning Ordinance which absolutely
80.4%