Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 4 of 10 · from the scan, no model involved
mthority to revoke the special use permit? 4. Was there adequate :ause to revoke the permit? 5. Did the BZA grant the railding permit? 6. Is the question of the ronstitutionality or validity of he Zoning Ordinance of Rappahannock County jroperly before the court in his proceeding? 7. Is the BZA aggrieved by he BZA’s decision? 8. Did the BZA act with nalice or bad faith? The only question out of he eight listed that couldn’t >e answered as a matter of aw is whether the BZA tbused its discretion in (1) ’ranting the special use >ermit and (2) subsequently evoking the same, according o Fitzgerald. In apparent agreement vith Fitzgerald’s assertion, udge Snead stated that he nay not have to rule on the ’threshhold legal issue” of he flood plain ordinance if he seven questions are answered first. He asked the Jther attorneys if they were satisfied with the record as it
82.2%