Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 7 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
Evangelistic Association's RS-1 property.
“This is the problem we have when lay people are asked to write technical laws." Miller responded. "I’m saying that Mr. Prudhum can have his hogs under the grandfather clause (which allows existing legal uses to continue) but I don’t know that for a fact.”
Thompson asked if other animals, chickens and horses for instance, are allowed by right under the proposed amendments. “Can you just go out and buy them and put them on the land?”
Miller answered that the amendments require a special use permit for livestock.
“What about the animals that we have now?” asked Thompson.
Baumgardner interjected that he reserved comment on the effect of the grandfather clause until executive session.
“So I don’t know,” Miller told Thompson. s
“Can what we wJmt to see put a stop to be grandfathered in?” asked Doris Donald, referring to the NPEA campground.
Baumgardner again declined comment, explaining that he is still involved in litigation representing the counts over the NPEA campground.
Following a half-hour executive session on pending litigation, the planning commissioners returned to open meeting and voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the proposed RS1 amendments to the board of supervisors.
In the only change from the legal advertisement of the amendments carried in the Rappahannock News, they deleted “except hogs" from agriculture allowed with a special permit.
84.4%