Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 3 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
All Five Acres Under
14 per cent?
Planner E. P. Luke asked where the line should be drawn on requiring five acres of land with slopes of 14 per cent or less. “Would we argue about 4.48 acres? About 4.25?...We’re saying Goode might have to redraw lot lines in order to conform (with the subdivision ordinance). Do all the lots have to have five plus acres under 14 per cent slope?” Luke asked.
“That’s my opinion,” answered Fannon.
“The last time we had a go-round on this thing, it was on rezoning,” Luke continued, referring to the Planning Commission's public hearing on Goode’s required rezoning from agriculture-conservation to residential subdivision held in August, 1976. Luke recalled that he had voted for the rezoning “with qualifications—I said I didn’t know whether Mr. Goode
I would get 14 lots or nine lots" based on the compliance with the subdivision ordinance slope requirement.
Luke suggested that representatives from the planning commission meet with Goode and explain what needs to be done in order for the development to comply with county ordinances.
“1 disagree,” countered Fannon. “We should tell him to file a plat that shows five acres under 14 per cent in each lot."
Luke replied that Goode’s engineers think that the plat already on file complies "or they wouldn’t have submitted
94.0%