Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 3 · column 2 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
review alternatives to the proposed line. Laxaro said.
“It’s stacking the deck" in Dominion's favor, he said Monday. “This is prejudicing our case."
Del. Clifford L. “Clay* Athey Jr. i R-Front Royal) described the amendments as devastating and the governors motives as incomprehensible.
Under Koine’s proposed changes, “pretty much the only evidence* the SCC could receive about conservation alternatives to a proposed transmission line would come from utility companies. Athey said Monday.
That gives utilities no compelling reason to consider conservation or the control and management of demand for electricity to mitigate the need for mare transmission lines. Athey said.
“I am adamantly opposed to* the Kaine amendments, said the delegate. whose 18th District includes Warren and part of Frederick and Fauquier counties. “I am absolutely opposed to this. For the life of me. f can’t fathom what the governor is thinking.*
Walz. the governor’s senior energy policy advisor said the proposed language doesn't intend to give Dominion and other utilities a free pass on conservation measures.
Instead, it tries to clarify Virginia's long-range energy consumption goals by separating peak and overall energy use, he said.
The existing bill foils to
47.4%