Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 7 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
Obenshain and Del. Allen L. Louderback, both Republicans, are signed by the 17 residents.
The argument now may have taken on a new shape, not about paving, but about the indifference of government.
“Why were we treated like this,” asks Hanback in an interview. “That’s more serious.”
The residents of the road claim that they have another petition in the making with hundreds of county residents on it who oppose the way the supervisors ignored the wishes of the people.
The supervisors voted on what they called a compromise to pave three-tenths of a mile at $30,000 which ends at Newlin’s home, but other residents argue that this step will lead to the whole road being paved at a cost of $150,000.
“The proposed surface change ends at tbe driveway of the couple who asked that the entire road be paved,” they wrote Del. Louderback. “We feel this is an egregious use of tax money for what is, in essence, a private driveway extension.”
Lindsay W.G. Eastham, perhaps the largest land owner along the road, wrote to County Administrator John McCarthy last May.
“If we choose convenience
96.1%