Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 2 · column 5 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

PowerUnes

(Continued from page 1) parties.” In this case, the Commission said, “interested parties” meant other electric companies through whose territory a transmission line might run. The application of. Potomac Edison for the 138KV transmission line through Rappahannock County falls in this category, the Commission explained and therefore does not require a formal hearing with notice to the public. This would indicate that the public’s right to be heard on the proposed line would be through the local zoning board.

Meanwhile, the Board of Zoning Appeals has received a letter from Duncan Gibb, attorney for Potomac Edison, enclosing a list of the names of the land owners in Rappahannock County which the power company has determined might be affected at this time by the proposed transmission line. Mr. Gibb said in the letter that the list might vary as a result of an examination to the title to the properties, or if the proposed location of the line is changed.

Following is the list of property owners: Joseph B. Burke, Hattie Deal Estate, Edmund Burke, Patsy Smith Estate, A. C. Rimoldi and J. Roger MacGuigan, Reginald Burroughs, George N. McDonald, Robert W. Sealock, J. F. Cannon Estate, Hilda Kalish, Dr. Daniel Pompa, Charles B. Seib and William A. Korns, Lawrence R. Dennis, Elizabeth M. Imhoff and Vincent D. Maynard.

94.9%