Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 3 · column 1 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
It would be a whole different situation," remarked Mrs. Johnson.
Board chairman Dick Latham noted that state supervisory personnel wouldn't have to take advice from an advisory board should they choose not to.
After consideration. Mrs. Johnson said she still felt the same way about not wanting to serve on an advisory board. However, she added i hat maybe her feelings would change if she could see state administration in "another light."
“It's a huge issue. It will be bitterly fought," said Mrs. Buntin. noting that the statewide organization of welfare superintendents was adamantly opposed to losing local administration.
Ellen Mustoe questioned whether the switch to state administration would mean more forms and reports for local welfare workers to fill out. "I'm already fed up with this." she said, adding that she’d been able to provide more direct services five years ago than she was able to do now.
Acknowledging that the increased paper burden was due. in part, to the move towards computerization, Mrs. Buntin noted that social workers would have more time to provide direct services if Welfare Departments could hire clerks to fill out the forms that are fed into computers.
Returning to the issue of state administration, Latham maintained that a change would allow more abuse of
73.7%