Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 9 · column 1 of 5 · from the scan, no model involved
“YOU misinterpret the reason for the Zoning Appeals Board,’’ said Gardner. “These things should have been done by the Supervisors before it ever came to us. It is my opinion the Board of Supervisors has sifted this evidence before they passed on it. If they didn’t, then it is a flaw in their procedures and it should be passed back to them.” He also noted that anything the Appeals Board did would be subject to State Health Department approval, on specific questions about the site and the operations there.
Hal Forward, another board member, commented, however, “On the other hand, we ought to satisfy ourselves that this won’t be injurious to the county.”
Francis Greene read from the county ordinance stating that “no land use shall be permitted which shall be hazardous, injurious,” etc., to the county. “The Board must make an official finding that this requirement is met,” he said. “There has been no evidence except that which is adverse to the soil types. The applicant has failed to present any case at all.”
Mrs. Updike insisted that “we did supply the Board (of Supervisors) with information on how we would put a gate at the entrance and operate in accordance with state specifications. We did not fail on our behalf.”
“They agreed to run the operation according to state regulations,” Gardner agreed.
96.0%