Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 7 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
a downzioning ot the ski area property. This recommendation has been made in spite of the fact that the Board has no power to make such a irecommendation.”
Baumgardner maintained that a commercial district is the only logical designation for the ski area property under the county’s existing zoning categories. “To contend that the Supervisors placed this property in a commercial district ’inadvertently’ is tantamount to charging the Board with incompetence or at the very least with not having read the zoning ordinance prior to acting on it,” Baumgardner contended.
“At this point, Baumgardner concluded, “M». Moore can only review his limited alternatives.”
Should Moore appeal the B2'.A’s denial to the Circuit Court, the presiding judge would not be restricted to either upholding or rejecting the action. According to the county zoning ordinance, “the court may reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the decision brought up for review.”
Col. E. P. Luke, Chairman of the Rappahannock Board of Supervisors, said last Friday that he intended to place the ski area issue on the Supervisor’s agenda for the meeting scheduled March 2.
77.3%