Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 5 · column 2 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
Nets Karson objected to the "piecemeal approach" to a "very large problem." He charged that the amendments before the Supervisors were “designed to cope with the Alpine slide case. Any other explanation is a smokescreen,” he insisted.
Parson questioned the advisability of combining conservation and recreation into a single district that allowed outdoor recreation as a use by right. “We can certainly allow recreation with controls, even profit making recreation, but it should be on a case-by-case basis, considered by the public, considered by you," he said to the Supervisors.
Approval of the amendments will allow “commercial exploitation of a conservation district by right." Parsons continued. "A property owner can do anything as long as it's called outdoor recreation." he said. "That aspect will be just devastating to the county,” Parson concluded. ; « r* » «
Werner Kreoser stated that he too felt there was "no real emergency" to change the zoning ordinance and that action on any amendments should be postponed until work on the county's
85.3%