Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 3 · column 4 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
comments from the listeners except during the period set aside for public presentations at the beginning of the meeting or at the close of the session, if time allowed.
At 10:30 p.m., before the Board went into a two-hour executive session, Mrs. Massie said she would permit comments from the audience for ten minutes.
Title I math lab teacher Molly Hobson asked if the Board thought teachers had opportunity during the entire month to respond to proposed evaluation criteria.
Mrs, Massie answered that she had no information on when the data was forwarded to teachers following the administration's review of reports on proposed evaluation procedures from committees at the elementary and high school. “I didn't say I thought you had the full month for interaction,” she added.
"Will we have input into the proposals during the next month (before the Board acts on the evaluation criteria at the December meeting)?'' asked high school teacher Edwin Ford.
Dr. Bloomer replied that he would like to have “any additional reaction from faculty members to relay to the School Board.” Mrs. Massie interjected that the Board members generally receive the meeting agenda and additional information on Thursday or Friday prior to the Board's session and noted that Bloomer should receive any comments from teachers in time for him to include it in the packets mailed to Board members. After a second inquiry from Ford regarding the possibility of allowing Dr Bloomer to authorize field trips without individual approval for every outing from the School Board, Mrs. Massie announced that the ten minutes allowed for questions were up and asked for a motion to go into executive session, leaving several persons unrecognized with their hands in the air.
89.3%