Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 3 · column 5 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
Bleu Rock
Continued from page A-1
uance. He noted that the applicant could withdraw the application "and resubmit it when they are ready.”
Stonewall-Hawthorn District representative Sharon Pierce said the zoning ordinance “gives no statutory consideration to the opposition.”
Mrs. Maeyer said said the applicants should “rearrange their schedules to be here. I think it’s unfair, and eventually it can be misused."
Dick McNear said, “All of us don’t have time to schedule a night a month.” He also said the application represented three different scenarios and the planners should make the applicant pay for three applications.
Jackson District representative David Fannon suggested Mr. McCarthy write to the applicants, pointing out that opponents had appeared and were disappointed that the applicants weren’t' present. “Strongly urge them to be here for the next meeting,” he said.
The planners next recommended approval fora subdivision requested by Sheila Sweet. Mrs. Sweet said she wanted to divide about 187 acres to give a 17-acre parcel to her stepdaughter. She said her step-daughter will inherit the rest of the land eventually.
The planners struggled with how to indicate that the density allowed on the rest of the land had been reduced by the gift of a separate parcel. Mrs. Sweet had previously divided the land to allow a sevenacre parcel for herself and her husband.
Mr. McCarthy suggested that the deed on the remaining parcel show that its density has been reduced by the two previous subdivisions and reference the special
61.3%