Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 3 · column 3 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
1970s; the funding provided, or not provided, by Congress; and the many players involved.
One major concern noted in the article is worth quoting, “The regulatory approach will need to change dramatically, with less emphasis an prescriptive oversight [this refers to perc tests, drain field size, safe distances from ground or surface water] and more on watershed impact with oversight of local management entities.” Management options
To aid communities in this concern, EPA has provided guidelines for the management of onsite/decentralized wastewater systems. There are five “model programs” from which a county or a town can pick and chose, depending on specific situations. The summaries below describe the complexity of the array of onsite and decentralized systems in use or available to the public and how they might be managed. Each “model program” has considerably more detail in its implementation.
Management Model 1: “Homeowner Awareness:”
95.0%