law, and that they have been generally described as

law, and that they have been generally described as non residents or parties whose addresses are unknown or of the general description of "parties unknown" and an affidavit having been made and filed to the aforesaid affect;

It is ORDERED that the said non resident party, namely Ruth Holmes and of the said party, George Thompson whose aoaress is unknown, if they be dying, and other persons who are designated as parties by the general description of "parties unknown", do appear on or before the 14th day of March, 1980 and do what is necessary to protect their interest.

IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that the foregoing portion of this Order be published once a week for four successive weeks in the Rappahannock News, a newspaper published in Rappahannock County, Virginia.

AND THIS CAUSE IS CONTINUED. ENTERED: January 22, 1980

Diane Bruce

Clerk WE ASK FOR THIS: HOLST & HARTSHORN Attorneys for the Complainant One First Virginia Plaza Suite One Hundred Forty-two 6400 Arlington Boulevard Falls Church, Virginia 22042 By: Roland D. Harshorn, p.q.

29f21

VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY HILDA BURKE Complainant vs. EARL W. BURKE P. O. Box 7104 Tamuning, Guam 96911 Defendant IN CHANCERY NO. 2977 ORDER OF PUBLICATION

Section (8.01 317)

This action seeks to partition between Hilda Burke and Earl W. Burke, formerly husband and wife, the real property conveyed to the parties hereto, as tenants by the entireties with common law right of survivorship, by deed from T. M. Johnston and Christine T. Johnston, said deed being recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Rappahannock County, Virginia in Deed Book 71, at Page 314, et seq., a copy of which has been filed as an Exhibit in this cause. This action also seeks to sequester the interest of the said Earl W. Burke in the real estate hereinafter described as the basis for a lump sum award of alimony and-or child support or, in the laternative, to withhold from said interest property of sufficient value to serve as security for alimony and child support payments, the award of said alimony and child support being a part of the subject matter of the case of Burke vs. Burke, Chancery Number 2913, the Complainant herein having filed a motion to have the said Chancery Cause Number 2913 reinstated on the docket of this Court and consolidated with this cause, the final decree of the Circuit Court and consolidated with this cause, the final decree of the Circuit Court of Rappahannock County in the said Chancery Cause Number 2913 having reserved unto the Court the right to award alimony and child support with leave to either party to reinstate said cause upon proper motion and notice. This real property is described as follows:

"Lot 1: Beginning at a stake on the East side of said Gay Street, the southweat corner of Lot 2 hereinbefore described and running thence with the line of said Gay Street, S 17 degrees 45' W 84' to a stake at the intersection of Gay and Middle Streets (said Middle Street being also known and designated on said plat as U. S. Route 211 Lee Highway), and running thence with the line of said Middle Street, S 72 degrees 47' E 167.2' to a stake in the line of said Middle Street, corner to the lands of Critzer, thence N 17 degrees 45' E 85.8' to a post In the line of Critzer and the Southeast corner of Lot 2 hereinbefore described thence with the line of said Lot 2 and the fence and hedgerow N 73 degrees 17' W 167.2' to the