Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 1 of 8 · from the scan, no model involved
By EUGENE McCARTHY Rappahannoc k News Guest Columnist
I have, after years of trying, figured out why the Russians and the Americans could make no progress in negotiating a limit on nuclear arms build up, even after both sides had, according to authorities, sufficient nuclear military power to destroy each other ten or twenty times. It was marginally within reason to allow for two killings, in fear of second comings, and possibly on the suspicion that Russians, like cats, might have nine lives, but to go beyond those limits was to move into the range of unreason.
Discussions of arms control and limitations began in the Eisenhower Administration and have continued in fits and starts (more have been started than have been concluded) through five suceeding presidential administrations and on into the Regan period.
As each new weapon system, missile, bomb, submarine, airplane, etc. was proposed, it was almost inevitably described by its U.S. advocates as a “bargaining chip” which would surely improve our position
89.6%