Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 1 · column 2 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
According to county attorney Peter Luke, Rappahannock’s Circuit Court created a seven-lot subdivision in 1962 through settlement of a partition suit involving 40 acres and those lots do not violate the current density provisons of the county’s zoning ordinance.
The subdivision issue was raised last month by attorney Franklin Reynolds, who represents several unnamed county residents. Mr. Reynolds has maintained that Judge Rayner V. Snead’s decree in Davis v. Tutt divided the 40 acres into just two parcels on opposite sides of Rt. 649, one of 32.367 acres conveyed to E. A. Estes, and the second smaller parcel bought by another party. Subsequently, the land puchased by Mr. Estes was improperly recorded in the county’s land books as seven lots and taxed as such for 18 years, but without ever going through any subdivision process, according to Mr. Reynolds.
91.1%