Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 15 · column 4 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
Then your case is gone.”
“It ought to be argued on the level of strategic policy. It’s a whole new concept,” he said.
“What we have accepted until now has been deterrence by offense, without defense. . .What we ought to think about is whether the threat of an offense without defense is a greater deterrent than the threat of an offense if you think that you have some kind of defense.”
The greatest deterrent, he said, “is probably the threat of nuclear offense, a nuclear attack without defense.” Otherwise, “you start thinking like the French, building castles, armored knights, the Maginot Line. It never worked.”
“I probably feel more strongly about these policies than a lot of those who are doing it,” he added, “because I have watched the policies come along since the ’50s—Mutual Assured Destruction, strategic superiority, defense as a percentage of GNP—always changing the concept to justify the production of additional nuclear weapons.”
94.7%