Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 12 · column 4 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
Mr. bmet said that the nrst covenant against further subdivision would be excluded from that provision and that he also wants to exclude the second, which states that only one house may be built on a lot.
County Administrator John McCarthy said that if the covenants were attached as a proffer, he wanted the document also to state that the Board of Supervisors is not responsible for enforcing the restrictions.
George Wesselhoft, one of the Smets’ neighbors, said, “I concur with the large lot development.”
Board of Supervisors’ representative to the Planning Commission, Mike Massie, said, “People misunderstood what they read in the Rappahannock News. We wanted to keep part in two-acre lots and the rest in permanent open space.”
“They’re entitled to the same number of lots as they’re asking for,” Mr. Reynolds said. “This is not an increase in the number of lots, but a redefinition of them.” He maintained that about 10 acres was zoned R-2. That would allow five houses, he said. Another four lots could be created on the 110 acres in Agricultural zoning, and a tenth lot had already been split off some years before.
Noting that he had read in the paper that Jack on District Planner David Fannon had said he didn’t have any problem with the proposal, Supervisor Ellis Bingham, who also represents the district, told the commissioners, “David, this is one time I agree with you.”
“I’ve changed my mind since then, Colonel,” Mr. Fannon said. “I think we’re hr opposition again.”
“I’m more comfortable with that,” Col. Bingham said. “This is within the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan. I’d hate to see you, as a recommending group to the Board of
r
90.9%