Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 8 · column 6 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
it needs to be readvertised,” Miller said.
“The ad’s been running for two weeks. Why didn’t you say something before now?” asked Joyce Kramer.
“I didn’t have all the stuff in front of me. Then I found out there’s been all this jockeying back and forth,” Luke answered.
County Landmark
“The mill is one of the few landmarks we have left and he definitely would save it,” interjected Virginia Miller Lindstrom, Washington resident and officer of the county Historical Society.
“It’s a landmark as a mill, not as a restaurant,” remarked Commonwealth’s Attorney and adjoining landowner George Davis.
“What Peter’s done in the past has been an asset to the community, not a detriment,” countered Mrs. Lindstrom.
Restating his application at the planners’ request, Kramer said he wanted commercial zoning on the property to extend from the snack bar to the edge of the flood plain, “including any portion of the building that’s in the flood plain and nothing else.”
The Planners agreed to hold another public hearing Tuesday, July 3, at 7:30 p.m. in the court house—in time to make a recommendation before the Supervisors’ hearing on July 5—and to readvertise the hearing using Kramer’s wording. "I didn’t intend to speak out . . . but since I’ve been misquoted, in all fairness to me, I’ll have to,” announced Commonwealth’s Attorney Davis from the audience. He reported that notice of the rezoning he’d received as an adjoining landowner said the old mill snack bar was being considered for rezoning from agriculture to commercial. “I wanted to know why, since the snack bar was already commercial Davis explained. He said that Kramer had told. him the request included the old mill and all of the 3.9 acres west and east of the Rush River.
92.9%