Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 5 · column 3 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

consume, not produce. They do not build houses, grow better and cheaper food, provide clothing and transportation. As more wealth is taxed by non-productive governments, less remains for investment to raise living standards. The more laws and rules imposed from Washington and Richmond, the less freedom for the people of Rappahannock and Prince William counties.

Where services — defense, foreign affairs, order, mail — are needed, the absence of competition results in inefficiency. UPS does not provide better and cheaper service than the U.S. Postal Service because its workers are individually superior; it does because competition, Federal Express and others, works constantly to push UPS to improve service and lower costs.

Opportunities and results: Here too the parties differ sharply. Democrats aim for levelled results, for minimizing variations in wealth, never mind that this puts the cart before the horse and always leads to less for all.

Republicans believe in equal opportunity. It is a goal difficult to reach: nature does not provide us equal ability, determination or strength. But it is worth working for . : opportunities abounded in the United States in the last century, when governments’ roles and sizes were small. People of ambition, energy and ideas earned success for themselvesand benefits for society, created the world’s most prosperous economy. This at exactly the time when the U.S. was the world’s freest country — nut a coincidence.

Listen again to Senator Gramm:

“In 1980 Ronald Reagan created a new conservative majority in America ... by defining the central political issue of our times as the choice between more opportunity and more government. For 30 years there was only one idea in Washington and the Democrats had it. That idea was the expansion of government as the solution to every problem . . . The Reagan alternative was more freedom and opportunity to unleash the genius of the people to solve problems.”

Wealth is produced by people, not governments. The more opportunities open to all, the greater the advance in living standards for all. Conversly, the more government involvement, the slower the advance. Look at the “war on poverty”: hundreds of billions spent to eliminate it created a semi-permanent under

81.3%