Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 7 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
ed five feet frpm the Millers.
Normally, when VDOT widens a road ' they would request five feet on each side.
Massie thought that the Millers should give up 10 feet, because this subdivision would increase traffic flow on the road. ; • Since the landowner on the ether side of the road is doing nothing to influence the number of cars traveling on Route 6^5, the Millers should be responsible for both five-foot Requisitions. -* Delmare informed the beard that time was of the essence. He did agree to give VDOT a 10-foot right of way easement. However, the board still felt that there were too many access roads to the subdivision.
Welch also expressed disappointment because the plat presented by Delmare did not fclearly describe what the JiJillers wanted to do with right-of-way and access roads.
A motion by Massie to t&ble the proposal until the rjext meeting was unanimously approved.
In addition to the 10-foot right-of-way, the supervisors have asked Delmare for clariRECYCLE
91.5%