Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 1 · column 4 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
the permit, Bowers had neither begun construction on a permanent home nor removed the trailer from his property, thus violating the zoning ordinance, according to Konick and the planning commissioners.
Reached by phone and asked why he didn’t begin construction of a home as agreed. Bowers said he didn’t have the money to build and so he moved back into living quarters in the back of his commercial building, which by that time was rebuilt. That is where he and his family have continued to live.
Bowers has recently applied for a special use permit, after learning that such application is required to maintian a dwelling unit in a commercial building.
According to Konick, Bowers has been in violation of the Zoning Ordinance ever since moving back into his rebuilt commercial structure. The reason Bowers was allowed to live in the building prior to the fire, said Konick, was because such practice qualified as a “non-conforming use” of their commercially zoned property.
It did so because Bowers had lived in the building prior to enactment of
91.6%