Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 4 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
government (NEA) committee, no matter how qualified or prestigious its members and recipients. For every artist, art teacher, art exhibit, organization, and concert they subsidize, they must turn down many more.
Thus, the rejected artist is forced to finance his competitors with his tax dollars! The artist who isn’t helped by the NEA is, by definition, hurt by it, at least at tax time.
Leaving aside for the moment the after-the-fact criticism of Sen. Jesse Helms, is it not a subtle form of censorship to deny subsidies to one artist and give them to another? And, suppose an NEA committee rejects a work of art that is both obscene and lacking in artistic worth? Or must any obscene work
95.7%