Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 8 · column 5 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
natea. He noted tnat their property is "highly buffered," that it has good water, and that there is good visibility from US 211 to their entrance. He said that there will be minimal impact on the community as a result of the rezoning and he pointed that the application is unusual because the Lams are not doing it for economic gain. Mr. Henry concluded that he supported the rezoning if the proffers were modified to remove the possibility of further subdivision "in perpetuity."
Tom Tepper (StonewallHawthorne District) said that he had come to the meeting "with thoughts of denial of the application," but that part of the Planning Commission’s job was to listen to the public and that public support for the Lam's application was substantial. He said that he thought that the property fit the rural residential designation because of the lack of agricultural uses in the area, and that he support the application "if we can make sure that it's not a precedent."
Werner Krebser (Wakefield District) said that he totally disagreed. He pointed out that the Zoning Ordinance allows one house per 25 acres and
87.7%