Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 8 · column 5 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
said ll you do this, you get such a precedent that no court in this state will support you" in actions against the ordinance. Dr. Krebser said that in the elections next fall (2003), "you can vote in Supervisors who would turn the County into small lots," suggesting that anyone wishing for a change into the County’s zoning ordinance should do so not by approving this application, but by voting in officials who would seek such changes.
Dr. Krebser added that the Lams could achieve their objectives by applying for a family apartment, which would allow them to build a 1200 square foot home on their property for their son and his family without rezoning and without a subdivision.
Chairman Tom Junk (Piedmont District) joined Dr. Krebser in opposing the application. He said that that he was concerned about the precedent-setting that was "potentially very devastating." He added that "rezoning was a very big deal," and that the reason for the success of Rappahannock County's ordinance is because of the strict adherence to the 25-and 50acre (in conservation districts) minimums. Mr. Junk said that the "Lams appear to be super
86.7%