Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 1 · column 5 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
Richmond?” the committee members asked in their report.
Gilkey Opposed Changes
Keim told the supervisors on Monday that Gilkey, the board’s representative from Wakefield District, had also testified before the Game Commission, asking for a longer deer season in Rappahannock. According to Keim, Gilkey maintained that running deer with dogs was not a critical issue in the county and challenged a report that put crowd size at the supervisors' special meeting on hunting problems at approximately 200.
In the committee’s report supplied to the Rappahannock News, Keim and Henry noted that Gilkey had voted against regulation changes endorsed by the rest of the supervisors. “It has been our uhderstanding that when a motion has been voted on by the Board of Supervisors and passed by a majority vote that it is a closed matter...We feel that it is very unethical for (Gilkey) to go to Richmond and to identify himself as a member of the Board of Supervisors and to oppose this matter (equalization of deer season statewide and prohibition of running deer with dogs in Rappahannock)."
No Local Effort
Keim reported that he’d been asked by the Game Commissioners why the county supervisors have failed to adopt enabling legislation to control hunting abuses here, such as the cased gun law that would make it illegal to carry a
91.2%