Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 1 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

By DAPHNE HUTCHINSON

Rappahannock News Staff Writer

The Board of Zoning Appeals struggled with the definition of hardship last Wednesday before granting one variance to zoning regulations and persuading a second applicant to carry over his variance request until a meeting later this month.

“If we grant a variance, it has to alleviate a clearly demonstrable hardship,” explained BZA member Gregory Monahan. “Is there any evidence that you haven’t brought forward yet?” he asked Kinsey Wharton, who was seeking a sideyard variance to build a carport onto his residence on Route 648 nearAmiss ville.

“A carport is a convenience...If you don’t have a carport, you will continue to live there as you have for the last 14 years,” Mr. Monahan said. “We have to work with this law, interpret it, make sense out of it,” he continued, holding up Rappahannock’s zoning ordinance. “It’s not what we want to do or don’t want to u do.”

The three BZA members present for Wednesday’s session — Mr. Monahan, acting chairman Sharon Luke and James Swindler - agreed that Mr. Wharton’s unusually narrow lot gave rise to the difficulty in meeting the 50 foot side setback. His house already intrudes on the setback distance; the carport would be even closer to the adjoining property line, no matter where it is attached to Mr. Whorton’s dwelling. In addition,

94.7%