Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 8 · column 6 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
sence of taxes on their livestock and equipment, the policy of encourage ing agricultural and forestal districts and land use taxation. He said small landowners pay higher taxes because of land use taxation. “Is it fail! to make the small landowner pay more so his neighboring farm can t*» a dumping ground?” he asked. “We need to look at the whole ordinance and say what is in the best interest of the people of the county.” Mr,' Stokes said he was opposed to the ordinance as drafted because it did not allow for spreading the sludge from the Sperryville plant, but he’ would oppose spreading sludge generally. - • r*
Dr. Krebser’s motion to oppose the amendment was seconded 'by Mr. Gottlieb but failed 4 to 2. Theft Dr. Miller’s motion to support the amendment was seconded by Ms/ Pierce and passed 4 to 2. Jackson District representative David Fan4 non was not at the meeting. .,Z
Earlier the planners approved a special exception to make a building lot of 22 acres that had been left out? of a scenic easement. The property? is in an agricultural zone that nor-,, mally requires 25 acres, but no sepaf rate plat was filed for the 22 acres.-. At the time of the easement only/ five-acre lots were required. " 4
The planners tabled another ap-; plication for a special exception for a; subdivision because neighbors saidf not all interested property owners had received notice of the meeting,'? The application will be considered at the September meeting. There does not seem to be any basis for denying it. * 4.,
89.3%