Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 2 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
the Commissioner of Revenue in order to get my own facts straight in connection with the education controversy. I returned because "this is my own, my native land” and because there is no land more beautiful nor any people more charming than here. Nor do I own “two cars, two televisions, golf clubs or a tennis outfit” (I haven’t seen either of the latter two items in this County since 1 returned six months ago!) In this County I own exactly one Ford automobile (sans CB radio set). That’s all. Moreover, I'll trade my personal income right now for that of any teacher on the County payroll. Does that take care of that, “CP”?
I think "CP” owes me a personal apology, delivered exactly as the affront was delivered, i.e., in the Rappahannock News. Also, I ask “CP” to address these points, along with the expected apology:
(1) Do “let's consider Rappahannock's ability to pay.” Let’s have “CP’s” analysis of that ability to pay. Upon what factual data would “CP” base that ability to pay? But spare us, for God’s sake, any more nonsense about golf clubs, tennis rackets, and CB radios.
(2) Let “CP” tell us exactly how the School Board and school administrators have broken their word.
(3) Let “CP" tell us exactly how many of the County’s 55 teachers are “rejects" (and privately give their names to the School Board).
87.8%