Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 5 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
(Continued from Page 1 ) not.
Chairman Lee Bird advised the Board that the Planning Commission had decided that the hunt club appeal was not a zoning issue. Reynolds argued that Smith had gotten a profit from leasing a partial use of the land for a part of the year, and that Smith had said that he leased the land to the hunt club to earn money for expenses. Reynolds said that that excluded the use of Smith’s land from the protection of the ordinance which states that noncommercial recreational use of land is a right.
Konick told the Board that their decision in the matter could affect other hunt clubs in the area, and would mean that every landowner would have to have a special use permit to lease their land to a club. “I think that that would have a detrimental effect on the cause of zoning in the county,” said Konick. Reynolds said that the Board was just being asked to rule on the one case.
Kramer said that in his view a hunter who paid money to hunt would think that he or she had more rights than a non hunt club member, and that would push the land use more towards a commercial use. Board member James Swindler replied that the club is not open to the public, and that made the use non-commercial.
Chairman Bird said that he understood the concerns of the adjacent landowners, and that they have every right
86.6%