Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 16 · column 2 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

tion two years from now,” warned the technical services chief. If all the Stover tract was usable as a landfill, “it would pobably answer the county’s needs for the next 50 to 70 years,” Mr. Wright said. That “may or may not be the case. . .It may answer the county’s needs on a short term basis,” he concluded.

To the doubts raised by the technical services chief, Zoning Administrator John McCarthy said: “If he doesn’t have enough information to tell us what we can do, he’s got no business making ill-informed, ill-advised judgments on what we can’t do.”

Mr. McCarthy questioned why the Department of Waste Management’s representatives appear to be expressing reservations to Mr. Silverman and the citizens’ group and then not relaying those same reservations to the county. With the county never proposing to use the entire 99 acres for landfilling, the Department of Waste Management’s notation that “some areas. . .may be less than desirable” relayed no concern regarding suitability, he said.

The Board of Supervisors is aware the redesign work must be submitted for the next phase of the landfill, said Mr. McCarthy, adding that necessary geotechnical studies are already underway.

Addressing the economic feasibility, he pointed out that the redesign from a trench disposal system to an area fill has not occasioned an increase in cost. The two methods of landfilling carry essentially the same price tag, he said. “Nothing we’ve seen indicates that this is going to be any more expensive that anybody else’s landfill,” Mr. McCarthy reported, adding that the facility on the Stover tract will probably end up being a combination of trench and area fill.

“Most of the cost is* behind us: $90,000 for the road —that won’t come again; almost that much for the leachate pond and the sedimentation and erosion pond — that won’t come again either; the building, the well, the power into the site, the main line leachate collection system, the fence around the leachate pond — those are all one-time expenses. What will

89.4%