Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 14 · column 5 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
his next door neighbors,” Dr. Krebser said.
“He’ll need another special exception for the golf course,” Board of Supervisors representative Mike Massie said. “He’s not getting any more lots this way than if they were 25 acres. In the past we were not presented with something where the residue lot was used for something other than agriculture.”
“Shouldn’t we get a legal opinion?” Stonewall-Hawthom District representative Sharon Pierce asked.
“A golf course is a commercial use,” Dr. Krebser noted.
“If we don’t want a golf course, we ought to amend the ordinance,” Mr. Massie said.
“I don’t understand why there is this aversion to mixing uses,” Mr. McCarthy said.
“Then deduct 50 acres and don’t give any density to that,” Dr. Krebser said. “You can’t do both.”
“I see some logic to both sides,” Mrs. Pierce said.
“I tend to agree with Werner on the houses,” Mr. Gottlieb said. He added that he would subtract for the golf course but not for the lodge. He said that he also had a problem with the water demands of the project.
“We haven’t gotten to that yet,” Mrs. Pierce said.
“My position is that you take out 70 acres and apply the density to the residue,” Dr. Krebser said.
“We have not had a public hearing,” Dr. Krebser said. Others reminded him that there had been a public hearing on the original application in January.
“Dr. Rish has made a good faith effort,” Mr. Massie said. “He’s asked us a question. I think we should give him an answer.”
On the question of whether the property could be eligible for seven
94.9%